The order types and their business content
intended for this from the EBICS protocol permit a release based on the total
data available – via the accompanying note – or based on the content payment
data. For this purpose, the EBICS servers provide the most important
information for each of the contained single payments already in prepared form.
A customer system that shall display this data must not even know the specific
payment format. That is what makes the software so convenient. As an exception,
even a complete payment file can be transmitted. However, especially for large
bulk payments this counters the convenience just described.
In payments practice, not only are simple
payments and direct debits included in the ES folder but special payments with
very personal data that requires special protection must be included as well.
This includes pension and salary payments as well as bonuses and gratuities
which are not intended for the general public and certainly not for inspection
by the staff of a company.
This is exactly where a weakness of the
EBICS specification becomes apparent: the business transaction code or purpose
code that specifies the type of payment is missing when the single payments are
transferred. That is why the EBICS products used by the customer are not able
to protect the confidential data in a payment order, even if this was what the
company wanted. The software lacks the criterion to decide whether payment
details should be displayed or hidden.
Without an identifier in the specific payment
order, it is not possible to distinguish confidential from normal payments.
This means that the EDS is in principle unsuitable for checking and releasing
salary payments by EDS because it cannot be ruled out that unauthorised
employees will take a look at the possibly confidential information.
The EBICS society should therefore consider
an extension to the XML for the HVT, which will also transmit this important
information for the payment type. As long as this does not happen, the EDS can
only be used for salary payments to a limited extent.
Author: Michael Schunk
0 comments:
Post a Comment